Dr. Tavares is Assistant Professor at the University of Alabama and at work on a book project on the repertory system in early modern theater.
A DePaul MAWP alum wrote a book! And it comes out this month! Wow, we are so thrilled to celebrate Zhanna Slor and her debut novel, At the End of the World, Turn Left.
If you missed our alum profile of Zhanna, be sure to check it out here.
After I (hello, English Grad Assistant speaking) sat down over Zoom with Zhanna, she graciously sent me an ARC of her book. DePaul biases aside, I was hooked from the very first scene and its engagingly raw writing. Well, really, I knew I would like it after listening to the book’s playlist (linked on her website). When I sat down to read, and read and read some more, the following chapters affirmed my prediction.
The novel follows Maria (Masha) Pavlova as she returns to Milwaukee at her father’s request when her sister, Anastasia (Anna), goes missing in 2008. The book covers their family’s various experiences as Jewish Russian immigrants coming from 1980s Soviet Ukraine, and when we meet Masha, she’s returning to the U.S. after finding a home in Israel’s Orthodox community in her early twenties. While Masha searches for Anna, now 19 years old, readers see the sisters’ stories unfold in the past and present as they both search for their identities—what does it mean to begin childhood in the USSR and then live in the U.S. as growing adult women? We see their relationship with Riverwest—their adolescent home of vibrant color, grit, and drugs. As both Masha and Anna find themselves away from home, they learn about who they are as immigrants, daughters, Jews, sisters, Americans, Ukrainians, and women. We see them wrestle with a tension of knowing how much their parents had to sacrifice for them, feel the pressure to make it all worth it. While each family member is connected to each other, they each have their own cultural and home experiences, lending itself to gaps of understanding between generations that are explored throughout the novel. We see how each navigates the tension of then and now, of who they are, who they were hoped to be. and their connections to their homelands.
This literary mystery/thriller is captivating from the beginning with an intriguing plot and question over Anna’s disappearance, but I also kept reading for the characters themselves and their relationships with each other, themselves, with leaving, and with all the places of home. I’m truly grateful for the chance to read a story that gives insight into another multifaceted experience of what it means to go missing and come back.
Professor Michele Morano will be joining Zhanna on April 23rd for a virtual conversation. Click here for more information about the event and registration.
Follow her on social media here:
Congratulations to DePaul Alums Chris Schafele (BA 2020) and Emma Demski (BA 2019) for their recently published work!
Read Chris Schafele’s essay in the travel writing journal, Wanderlust. His essay comes from his Honor’s thesis.
Read Emma Demski’s essay in the anthology Atomic Flyswatter; Volume 1 from Long Shot Books.
Congrats to all from DePaul’s English Department!
Underground student contributor Sara Shahein caught up with DePaul Education alum Dina Rabadi and asked her about her experiences at DePaul, life after graduation, and her advice for graduating students. Read the full profile here.
Underground student contributor Sara Shahein caught up with DePaul English alum Shelley Jacobs and asked her about her experiences at DePaul, life after graduation, and her advice for graduating students. Read the full profile here.
Underground student contributor Sara Shahein caught up with DePaul English and MEd alum Amar Krad and asked her about her experiences at DePaul, life after graduation, and her advice for graduating students. Read the full profile here.
Underground student contributor Sara Shahein caught up with DePaul English and MAWP alum Alexandra Messina-Schultheis and asked her about her experiences at DePaul, life after graduation, and her advice for graduating students. Read the full profile here.
Tell us about yourself! Where are you from, and why did you choose DePaul for undergraduate study?
I’m originally from a suburb of Philadelphia on the New Jersey side of the Delaware River, but I did most of my growing up in Schaumburg, IL. I chose DePaul for undergrad because I love Chicago and I always wanted to go to school in the city. I was the Vice President of DePaul’s Sigma Tau Delta chapter, which is the Honors Society for English.
What was your official program of study, and when did or will you graduate?
I majored in English-Literary Studies with a minor in Economics. I graduated at the end of Winter Quarter.
What made you decide to major in English?
It seems sort of strange to me, but I can almost isolate a single moment when I knew I wanted to study English seriously. I’ve always been an avid reader, but I remember I was reading Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying in high school and when I got to the (in)famous Vardaman “My mother is a fish.” chapter I became completely enthralled. I thought almost pathologically for the next week about that single statement with its incredibly multifarious web of denotations, connotations, and implications. After that week I knew English was something I was passionate about.
What are your favorite English courses that you took here at DePaul? Which were your most influential professors?
I can honestly say I haven’t had a bad experience with a single DePaul English professor or course. If I had to pick professors who influenced me the most, it would be Prof. Fairhall, for serving as my thesis advisor and helping me get published in Creating Knowledge, as well as Prof. Dinius for providing me with my first research library experience working as her research assistant, and always having answers for my incessant 19th-century-American-Lit-releated questions.
In addition to recently completing your thesis, I’m told you wrote an award-winning paper on Beowulf that you presented at the annual Sigma Tau Delta conference. Can you share more about the honor, and a bit more on your paper?
The award I received was one of Sigma Tau Delta’s Isabel Sparks President’s Awards for the best papers/presentations in each critical/creative category at their annual conference. My paper “The Hall and the Un-Hall: Monsters and Setting in Beowulf” took second place in the “Critical Essays: British Literature and World Literature” category.
The paper argues that the central juxtaposition of the text is not the forces of the hall Heorot aligned with Beowulf against the forces of “evil” aligned with the wetlands, but the broader human forces of the “Hall” as opposed to the monstrous natural world of the “Un-Hall.” Heorot (the central hall in Beowulf) becomes both a material structure, shielding humans from the natural world, and a structure of the psyche embodying all that is joyful and human in opposition to the terror of the external environment. With this binary in mind, both Grendel and Grendel’s dam become figures of the uncanny that can subvert the established polarities. Their true horror as monsters lies not only in their capacity for physical violence, but because they challenge the ways in which humans of the “Hall” define themselves in relation to the more-than-human “Un-Hall.”
Tell us a bit more about your thesis. Any highlights from the research and writing process worth mentioning?
I’m happy to announce that an adapted version of my thesis has been accepted for presentations at two Association for the Study of Literature and the Environment symposia over the summer in New York and New Mexico. The thesis [which is on Walt Whitman] argues that Whitman’s tendency to dismantle boundaries between things, along with his often-radical egalitarianism, makes certain poems readable as a sort of “proto-posthumanism” in which the self is always-already a part of a vast network of interacting agencies not always restricted to the anthropological. It presents a reading of Whitman that is engaged with the environmental ethics concerns of the twenty-first century, and encourages seeing the more-than-human-world as something that is never “out there” or separate from humans as the term “Nature” has come to denote, but something that the speaker/poet is always intersubjectively implicated in.
Why did you choose to write about Whitman?
Whitman is my favorite poet, and my thesis was more or less always going to be about his work. I believe he had the prescience to recognize that he was writing at a very critical juncture of American history in which the “E Pluribus Unum” of the United States drifted dangerously close to “E Unibus Pluram.” As a result much of his work reflects this fundamental tension at the heart of any democratic project, negotiating the “self” in a world of what is apparently “others.”
What are your plans post-DePaul?
With any luck, grad school! I plan on studying English with a concentration in American Lit/Lit Theory and I’m in the early stages of assembling application materials for around ten programs.
We wish you the best of luck! Thanks for speaking with us.
*Adam will present an excerpt from his thesis at this year’s Spring English Conference, taking place on Friday, April 29th in Arts & Letters Hall from 10am-4:30pm.
John Kersey – Adjunct English Professor & Author – 2005 DePaul Alum
Read this interview with John Kersey if thoughts of life after graduation have ever popped into your mind. John has given DePaul undergraduates a thoughtful, in-depth view into how he achieved his dream of becoming a writer and English teacher. Read on for inspiration and guidance!
John Kersey graduated from DePaul in 2005 with a bachelor’s degree in English. In 2011, he received his MFAW from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. His short stories and essays have appeared in Fifth Wednesday Journal, Trop, and the Chicago Tribune. He teaches English and creative writing at Elgin Community College, and lives in Chicago with his wife and their two children.
Underground: What year did you complete your degree in English at DePaul? Did you have a concentration, or did you double major or minor in another area?
John Kersey: I graduated in 2005. My major was English with a “focus” (this is what the department called it at the time, if I remember correctly) in creative writing.
U-2: Did you pursue any graduate or professional studies after you graduated?
JK-2: Not immediately. I had a sense that I wanted to go to graduate school for an MFA, but I wasn’t sure if the writer’s life was the life I wanted. I also hadn’t produced enough work yet for a portfolio because I didn’t realize I wanted to write short stories until late in my junior year at DePaul, when I took a literature seminar with Dr. Ingrasci on Hemingway, Faulkner and Bellow, and an advanced fiction workshop with Dan Stolar. Nobody had ever taken me as deep into fiction as Ingrasci, (I’ll never forget the experience of reading “The Bear” in Go Down Moses) and Stolar showed me that I had a talent for writing prose. I remember Dan wrote “This is impressive,” on the back of the first short story I submitted, and that was just fantastic. I’d worked on that story night and day for like three weeks. I probably read those three words a hundred times as I walked back to my apartment after workshop then passed out from exhaustion. So after I left DePaul I spent two years serving tables in the evening to support myself, and writing during the day. Two stories that I wrote during that time, along with a revised version of the story I’d submitted to Stolar, wound up being the work that got me accepted to the School of The Art Institute of Chicago. I studied there for three years and received my MFA in 2011.
U-3: What’s your current position? Describe a typical day at work.
JK-3: I’m an adjunct English instructor at Elgin Community College. When I’m not teaching or in office hours, I work from home on class work, short stories, and any freelance writing assignments that come my way. Typically, I wake up a little before 4 am and tiptoe over to my office to squeeze in two to three hours of writing before my children wake up. After breakfast and a wagon ride with my daughter (my son, who’s still too small, stays home with my wife), I’ll head back upstairs and write for another couple hours, then prepare for class and grade papers if they’re around. I typically teach three classes during the semester, two sections of Composition 101 and one section of creative writing.
U-4: How did you find your first job after graduation and/or your current position? Be specific about the steps you took to explore possibilities and to secure a position. (Inquiring minds want to know!)
JK-4: In graduate school I fooled myself into thinking that my writing would immediately open doors for me. This was not the case, especially because I write very slowly and after three years at SAIC I had just two complete stories, neither one published, and a whole lot of sketches. Even during my third year, I kept telling myself that all I had to do was focus on honing my craft and writing the best prose I could write, and if I did this everything would be fine. In retrospect, I should have dedicated a little more energy to figuring out how I was going to support myself after grad school. I knew I wanted to teach English, so I could have tried to gain some teaching experience as a TA. I could have looked into a teacher-training program.
I almost set myself up for what I think would have been a difficult time trying to land on my feet after graduation, but I got lucky. A close friend of mine introduced me to his stepmother, an English Professor at Elgin, where they needed a new adjunct. We bonded over books we both loved and hit it off right away. After an interview with the Dean, the school offered me the position. I had no teaching experience, but they gave me a shot. That was in April 2011. I earned my master’s degree two months later and started teaching at ECC two months after that. I’ve been teaching there ever since.
U-5: How important has networking been in your employment searches? How did you find or build contacts in your desired field?
JK-5: The great hope for any writer is that your work will be undeniably good and impossible for a reader to ignore. I think you have to believe that you’re capable of creating something like this, but it’s not always a realistic way to think; indeed, you also have to realize you’re capable of writing something terrible if you’re not subjecting your work to intense scrutiny. The first story I published was rejected by six publications before an instructor of mine from SAIC, Jim McManus, asked if I’d like him to send it to a colleague of his (Eileen Favorite) who was guest editing at Fifth Wednesday Journal. Instead of arriving on a slush pile with most of the other submissions, my story reached Eileen independently, and with backing from someone whose opinion she respected. Perhaps that made all the difference. I’m not sure. Knowing people and forming reliable networks can certainly make things happen, and happen faster. But my writing career hasn’t only advanced in situations where I knew someone. The most recent story I published appeared in The Chicago Tribune’s Printers Row Journal, where it was picked off the slush pile—I knew exactly zero people there. Truth is, you can have a clear line of connections to Deborah Treisman at The New Yorker, or you can be the brother-in-law of Lorin Stein at The Paris Review—if the writing isn’t good, no one is going to publish it.
U-6: How does your English major help you in your current position?
JK-6: Oh, boy. This is sort of a whopper of a question. A more realistic question to answer would be, how doesn’t your English major help you in your current position? Or, even, how doesn’t it help you in your everyday life? I think the beauty of majoring in English is that the idea of a “career” isn’t always so clearly defined. The English major understands that her degree is contributing as much to the quality of her character, her ability to feel empathy, as it is to the quality of her ultimate career. I’m reading a great book called Why Teach? In his chapter titled “The English Major,” the author Mark Edmundson of the University of Virginia, writes, “To me an English major is someone who has decided, against all kinds of pious, prudent advice and all kinds of fears and resistances, to major, quite simply, in becoming a person.” Right on.
U-7: What advice would you give current English majors about their studies or extracurricular activities while they are still at DePaul?
JK-7: Take a moment to lean back and just enjoy how awesome it is to be a student. Truly appreciate the free pass you have to be completely self-absorbed. Because after you graduate, you’re going to take a big juicy bite out of life, discover a career, fall in love, get your heart broken, get mugged walking home from the bar, fall in love again, have some kids, buy a house, drown in bills, create an elaborate filing system for your bills in order to prevent drowning in them, et cetera. But you get older—ridiculously fast—and you’ll reach a point where you can’t just suddenly announce to your significant other, “Hey, babe, I know there’s a lot going on, but I’m just going to take these next four weeks here to focus on my intellectual growth—you can handle the bills and the kids and the trips to grocery store and driving my mother to the dentist next Tuesday, right?—then I’ll be back.” As a student, it’s your obligation to be selfish. Enjoy it while you can get away with it.
U-8: What advice would you give to graduating students as they move into the job market?
JK-8: If you’re not dating someone, now would be a good time for a companion.
U-9: Is there any additional advice or information you would like to pass on to our majors?
JK – 9: Read. Never stop. And not just anything. The good stuff. Reading just anything doesn’t count. There’s one hell of an enormous difference between E L James and Henry James.
Thank you, John, for your words of wisdom!